{"id":286,"date":"2024-11-17T15:37:28","date_gmt":"2024-11-17T15:37:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/?p=286"},"modified":"2025-01-30T08:48:44","modified_gmt":"2025-01-30T08:48:44","slug":"tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/","title":{"rendered":"Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti sesizeaz\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei la cererea Cabinetului de Avocat Tecaru Viorel \u2013 problema nerespect\u0103rii termenelor procedurale imperative din materia m\u0103surilor preventive"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-gallery has-nested-images columns-default is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" data-id=\"288\" src=\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/tempImagejjaDio.heic\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-288\"\/><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">La data de&nbsp;<strong>11 iulie 2024<\/strong>, \u00een dosarul&nbsp;<strong>15962\/301\/2024\/a1.3<\/strong>, Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti a admis cererea de sesizare a&nbsp;<strong>Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Rom\u00e2niei (CCR)<\/strong>&nbsp;formulat\u0103 de mine, \u00een calitate de ap\u0103r\u0103tor, \u0219i a dispus sesizarea CCR cu privire la&nbsp;<strong>neconstitu\u021bionalitatea prevederilor art. 205 alin. (3) \u0219i (4) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 (CPP)<\/strong>, prin raportare la prevederile&nbsp;<strong>art. 1 alin. (3) \u0219i (5), art. 21 alin. (1) \u0219i (3), respectiv art. 23 alin. (2) \u0219i (7) din Constitu\u021bia Rom\u00e2niei<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Aceast\u0103 sesizare abordeaz\u0103 problematica lipsei unei sanc\u021biuni procedurale pentru nerespectarea termenului procedural imperativ prev\u0103zut de art. 205 alin. (4) CPP, ceea ce ridic\u0103 probleme grave din perspectiva <strong>principiului legalit\u0103\u021bii<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>accesului liber la justi\u021bie<\/strong>, precum \u0219i a respect\u0103rii dreptului la libertate individual\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Cadru normativ \u0219i obiectul excep\u021biei<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Dispozi\u021biile legale criticate sunt urm\u0103toarele:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Art. 205 alin. (3) CPP<\/strong>: \u201eContesta\u021bia formulat\u0103 \u00eempotriva \u00eencheierii prin care s-a dispus luarea sau men\u021binerea unei m\u0103suri preventive ori prin care s-a constatat \u00eencetarea de drept a acesteia nu este suspensiv\u0103 de executare.\u201d<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Art. 205 alin. (4) CPP<\/strong>: \u201eContesta\u021bia formulat\u0103 de inculpat se solu\u021bioneaz\u0103 \u00een termen de 5 zile de la \u00eenregistrare.\u201d<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Aceste dispozi\u021bii stabilesc un termen procedural pentru solu\u021bionarea contesta\u021biei formulate \u00eempotriva m\u0103surilor preventive, \u00eens\u0103 legisla\u021bia nu prevede o sanc\u021biune procesual\u0103 pentru nerespectarea acestuia, ceea ce genereaz\u0103 multiple implica\u021bii negative \u00een practic\u0103. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen concret, sunt dese situa\u021biile \u00een care contesta\u021bia inculpatului asupra c\u0103ruia s-a men\u021binut o m\u0103sur\u0103 preventiv\u0103, cum este arestarea preventiv\u0103, este solu\u021bionat\u0103 dup\u0103 mai mult de jum\u0103tate din perioada pentru care s-a men\u021binut m\u0103sura respectiv\u0103, de pild\u0103, atunci c\u00e2nd contesta\u021bia \u00eempotriva \u00eencheierii de men\u021binere a m\u0103surii arest\u0103rii preventive este solu\u021bionat\u0103 dup\u0103 20 zile, din cele 30 de zile pentru care a fost men\u021binut\u0103. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen practic\u0103 au fost chiar \u0219i cazuri \u00een care de\u0219i inculpatul formulase contesta\u021bie \u00eempotriva \u00eencheierii de men\u021binere a m\u0103surii arest\u0103rii preventive, contesta\u021bia sa a fost solu\u021bionat\u0103 dup\u0103 expirarea duratei m\u0103surii respective, cu inculpatul tot \u00een stare de arest pentru c\u0103 prima instan\u021b\u0103 deja procedase la o nou\u0103 verificare \u0219i pronun\u021base o alt\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2re de men\u021binere a m\u0103surii preventive. O astfel de abordare constituie o respectare iluzorie, pur formal\u0103 a drepturilor persoanelor acuzate, facilitat\u0103 doar de cadrul legal actual, care nu prevede o sanc\u021biune pentru nerespectarea de c\u0103tre instan\u021be a unor termene procedurale imperative. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Motive de neconstitu\u021bionalitate<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Termenul prev\u0103zut de art. 204 alin. (5) CPP este un termen imperativ, indiferent de tipul \u00eencheierii contestate<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen concordan\u021b\u0103 cu Decizia ICCJ nr. 25\/2008 privind examinarea recursului \u00een interesul legii, declarat de procurorul general al Parchetului de pe l\u00e2ng\u0103 \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie, \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu interpretarea \u015fi aplicarea dispozi\u021biilor art. 159 alin. 8 fraza a II-a din vechiul Cod de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 referitoare la termenul de solu\u021bionare a recursului declarat \u00eempotriva \u00eencheierii prin care s-a hot\u0103r\u00e2t asupra prelungirii arest\u0103rii preventive dispuse \u00een cursul urm\u0103ririi penale, prin Decizia nr. 275 din 23 aprilie 2019 \u0219i Decizia nr. 831 din 12 decembrie 2019, Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei a re\u021binut faptul c\u0103\u00a0<strong>termenul de 5 zile pentru solu\u021bionarea contesta\u021biei inculpatului \u00eempotriva \u00eencheierii prin care se dispune asupra m\u0103surilor preventive \u00een cursul procesului penal, prev\u0103zut de art. 204 alin. (4) sau art. 205 alin. (4) CPP este un termen imperativ, nu de recomandar<\/strong>e (Decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Rom\u00e2niei nr. 831 din 12 decembrie 2019, para. 15, 17, Decizia Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Rom\u00e2niei nr. 275 din 23 aprilie 2019, para. 26).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Deciziile men\u021bionate anterior au fost pronun\u021bate \u00een urma unor excep\u021bii de neconstitu\u021bionalitate invocate \u00een cauze ce priveau contesta\u021bii \u00eempotriva unor \u00eencheieri de \u00eenlocuire a m\u0103surii arestului preventiv cu arestul la domiciliu, \u00eencheieri neexecutorii prin raportare la prevederile art. 204 alin. (3) CPP.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Cu toate acestea, nici dispozi\u021biile art. 205 alin. (4) CPP \u0219i nici considerentele deciziilor pronun\u021bate de Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 nu fac diferen\u021ba \u00eentre tipul sau obiectul contesta\u021biei, termenul pentru solu\u021bionarea contesta\u021biei fiind acela\u0219i \u0219i av\u00e2nd aceea\u0219i natur\u0103 juridic\u0103, indiferent c\u0103 obiectul contesta\u021biei este o \u00eencheiere executorie (precum cea de men\u021binere a m\u0103surii preventive) sau neexecutorie (precum cea de \u00eenlocuire a m\u0103surii preventive), prin raportare la dispozi\u021biile art. 205 alin. (3) CPP.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><u><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Aceea\u0219i opinia a fost \u00eemp\u0103rt\u0103\u0219ite de c\u0103tre Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103, care prin Decizia nr. 571 din 31 octombrie 2023, sesizat\u0103 fiind cu o excep\u021bie de <\/span><\/u><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">neconstitu\u021bionalitate<\/span><u><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"> a dispozi\u021biilor art. 205 alin. (4) CPP, invocate \u00een cadrul unei contesta\u021bii \u00eempotriva unei \u00eencheieri de men\u021binere a m\u0103surii preventive de c\u0103tre judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103, a respins ca ne\u00eentemeiat\u0103 excep\u021bia de neconstitu\u021bionalitate cu argumentul c\u0103 prin Deciziile 275\/2019 \u0219i 831\/2019 s-a statuat deja c\u0103 art. 205 alin. (4) CPP reglementeaz\u0103 un termen imperativ.\u00a0<\/span><\/u><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A\u0219adar, orientarea Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale este clar\u0103, \u00een sensul \u00een care prevederile art. 204 alin. (5) trebuie interpretate \u00een sensul \u00een care reglementeaz\u0103 un termen imperativ, indiferent de tipul \u00eencheierii contestate (fiind de altfel inadmisibil ca un termen procedural s\u0103 fie ambivalent \u2013 imperativ \u00een cazul \u00eencheierilor neexecutorii \u0219i de recomandare \u00een cazul celor executorii).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Reglementarea unui termen procedural imperativ, ne\u00eenso\u021bit de o sanc\u021biune, precum \u0219i interpretarea conform c\u0103ruia termenul procedural imperativ ar curge de la un moment stabilit discre\u021bionar de instan\u021ba a c\u0103rei hot\u0103r\u00e2re se contest\u0103 sunt contrare art. 1 alin. (3) \u015fi (5), art. 21 alin. (1), (3), art. 23 alin. (2) \u0219i (7) din Constitu\u021bia Rom\u00e2niei<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Potrivit Deciziei Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale nr. 336 din 30 aprilie 2015, Curtea re\u021bine c\u0103 una dintre garan\u021biile cele mai puternice pentru asigurarea \u00eendeplinirii actelor procesuale \u0219i procedurale potrivit prescrip\u021biilor legii o constituie sanc\u021biunea procesual penal\u0103, care const\u0103 fie \u00een pierderea unor drepturi procesuale, fie \u00een lipsirea de valabilitate a actelor procesuale \u0219i procedurale ori a m\u0103surilor procesuale dispuse sau efectuate cu \u00eenc\u0103lcarea condi\u021biilor impuse de norma de procedur\u0103. Sanc\u021biunile privind nerespectarea termenelor procedurale deriv\u0103 din&nbsp;<strong>principiul legalit\u0103\u021bii procesului penal<\/strong>, enun\u021bat de art.2 din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 \u0219i consfin\u021bit prin dispozi\u021biile art.23 alin.(12) din Legea fundamental\u0103, \/&#8230;\/ (para. 26)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Prin Decizia nr. 302 din 4 mai 2017,<\/strong>&nbsp;Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a constatat c\u0103 solu\u021bia legislativ\u0103 cuprins\u0103 \u00een dispozi\u021biile art. 281 alin. (1) lit. b) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103, care nu reglementa \u00een categoria nulit\u0103\u021bilor absolute \u00eenc\u0103lcarea dispozi\u021biilor referitoare la competen\u0163a material\u0103 \u015fi dup\u0103 calitatea persoanei a organului de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103, este neconstitu\u0163ional\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pentru adoptarea acestei decizii, Curtea a analizat \u00een ce m\u0103sur\u0103 lipsa sanc\u021biunii nulit\u0103\u021bii absolute pentru \u00eenc\u0103lcarea normelor de competen\u021b\u0103 material\u0103 \u0219i personal\u0103 a organului de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103 a constituit o \u00eenc\u0103lcare a principiilor, valorilor \u015fi exigen\u0163elor constitu\u0163ionale \u0219i a decis c\u0103 prin eliminarea sanc\u021biunii nulit\u0103\u021bii absolute, prin raportate la importan\u021ba normelor ocrotite, legiuitorul nu \u015fi-a \u00eendeplinit obliga\u0163ia ce decurge din respectarea principiului legalit\u0103\u0163ii, ceea ce contravine art. 1 alin. (3) \u015fi (5) \u015fi art. 21 alin. (3) din Constitu\u021bie. (para. 35, 63 din Decizia CCR nr. 302\/2017)\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Urm\u00e2nd aceea\u0219i logic\u0103 juridic\u0103 precum cea din cuprinsul Deciziei Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale nr. 302\/ 2017, se cer a fi analizate\u00a0 (i)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0importan\u021ba drepturilor \u0219i libert\u0103\u021bilor ocrotite prin reglementarea termenului de solu\u021bionare a contesta\u021biei \u00eempotriva \u00eencheierii judec\u0103torului de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 prin care dispune asupra m\u0103surilor preventive, \u00een special atunci c\u00e2nd se dispune men\u021binea m\u0103surii preventive (art. 205 alin. (4) \u0219i\u00a0 (ii)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0care sunt consecin\u021bele practice ce deriv\u0103 din lipsa unei sanc\u021biuni procesuale pentru nerespectarea acestui termen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Termenele prev\u0103zute la art. 205 alin. (1) \u0219i (4) au fost reglementate pentru a asigura respectarea dreptului la libertate \u0219i siguran\u021b\u0103 prev\u0103zut de art. 5 alin. (4) din Conven\u021bia European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului, c\u00e2t \u0219i de art. 23 alin. (2) \u0219i (7) din Constitu\u021bie. \u00cen ceea ce prive\u0219te interpretarea prevederilor Conven\u021biei Europene a Drepturilor Omului, red\u0103m \u00een continuare urm\u0103toarele paragrafe:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Articolul 5 \u00a7 4 nu oblig\u0103 statele-p\u0103r\u021bi s\u0103 instituie dou\u0103 grade de jurisdic\u021bie pentru examinarea legalit\u0103\u021bii deten\u021biei. Cu toate acestea, odat\u0103 ce statul adopt\u0103 un astfel de sistem, acesta, \u00een principiu, trebuie s\u0103 ofere acelea\u0219i garan\u021bii \u00een procedurile de apel sau recurs, precum \u0219i \u00een prim\u0103 instan\u021b\u0103 (Ilnseher c. Germaniei [MC], \u00a7 254; Ku\u010dera c. Slovaciei, \u00a7 107; Navarra c. Fran\u021bei, \u00a7 28; Toth c. Austriei, \u00a7 84).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Odat\u0103 ce libertatea este pus\u0103 \u00een discu\u021bie, Curtea aplic\u0103 criterii mai stricte pentru a stabili dac\u0103 statul \u0219i-a respectat obliga\u021bia de examinare a legalit\u0103\u021bii deten\u021biei \u00eentr-un termen scurt (Kadem c. Maltei, \u00a7\u00a7 44-45, \u00een care Curtea a considerat excesiv\u0103 examinarea legalit\u0103\u021bii deten\u021biei care a durat 17 zile; \u0219i Mamedova c. Rusiei, \u00a7 96, \u00een care termenele de examinare \u00een procedurile de apel, printre altele cu o durat\u0103 de 26 de zile, au fost contrare condi\u021biei de \u201eceleritate\u201d).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Prin urmare, dispozi\u021biile art. 204 alin. (5) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103, ca de altfel toate celelalte dispozi\u021bii legale \u00een baza c\u0103rora o persoan\u0103 ajunge s\u0103 fie privat\u0103 de libertate sunt deosebit de importante din perspectiva respect\u0103rii art. 23 din Constitu\u021bie, c\u00e2t \u0219i din prisma art. 1 alin. (3) \u015fi (5) \u015fi art. 21 alin. (3) din Constitu\u021bie referitoare la principiul legalit\u0103\u021bii. Fiind norme juridice care vizeaz\u0103 direct libertatea fizic\u0103 a unei persoane, importan\u021ba acestora ar trebui s\u0103 fie considerat\u0103 cel pu\u021bin egal\u0103, dac\u0103 nu v\u0103dit superioar\u0103 normelor referitoare la competen\u021b\u0103 material\u0103 sau dup\u0103 calitatea persoanei a organelor de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A\u0219adar, dac\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei a decis c\u0103 \u00eenc\u0103lcarea normelor de competen\u021b\u0103 material\u0103 sau personal\u0103 a organului de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103 trebuie sanc\u021bionat\u0103 cu nulitatea absolut\u0103, \u00een mod obligatoriu o sanc\u021biune cel pu\u021bin la fel de eficient\u0103 se impune \u00een privin\u021ba normelor imperative privind termenul de solu\u021bionare a contesta\u021biei \u00eempotriva \u00eencheierii prin care se dispune asupra m\u0103surilor preventive de c\u0103tre judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Consecin\u021bele nerespect\u0103rii prevederilor articolului 205 alin. (4) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 nu sunt pur teoretice \u0219i sunt extrem de serioase, fiind observate \u00een practica judiciar\u0103: contesta\u021bii solu\u021bionate, dup\u0103 20 de zile din cele 30 pentru care s-a men\u021binut o m\u0103sur\u0103 preventiv\u0103 ori contesta\u021bii solu\u021bionate dup\u0103 ce judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 deja a pronun\u021bat o nou\u0103 \u00eencheiere de men\u021binere a m\u0103surii preventive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen toate aceste cazuri, respectarea drepturilor prev\u0103zute de art. 23 alin. (2), (7) din Constitu\u021bie, respectiv art. 5 alin. (4) din CEDO este pur teoretic\u0103 \u0219i iluzorie \u00eentruc\u00e2t solu\u021bia dat\u0103 contesta\u021biei devine prea pu\u021bin eficient\u0103 sau uneori, chiar deloc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Totodat\u0103, se ridic\u0103 problema obiectivit\u0103\u021bii judec\u0103torului contesta\u021biei, dac\u0103 acesta este pus \u00een situa\u021bia de a invalida o hot\u0103r\u00e2re ce  a fost deja \u201eexecutat\u0103\u201d \u00een totalitate sau \u00een parte, cu consecin\u021ba priv\u0103rii de libertate a unei persoane (e.g. s\u0103 admit\u0103 o contesta\u021bie \u00eempotriva unei \u00eencheieri de men\u021binere a arestului preventiv \u0219i s\u0103 constate c\u0103 inculpatul a fost arestat preventiv \u00een mod nelegal, dup\u0103 20 de zile din cele 30 de zile aferente m\u0103surii preventive).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">De asemenea, \u00een lipsa unui termen imperativ \u00eenso\u021bit de o sanc\u021biune, judec\u0103torul contesta\u021biei este obligat s\u0103 resping\u0103 contesta\u021bia atunci c\u00e2nd \u00eentre timp, judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 de la instan\u021ba de fond a solu\u021bionat un nou dosar de verificare a m\u0103surii preventive, men\u021bin\u00e2nd-o. Altminteri, hot\u0103r\u00e2rea pronun\u021bat\u0103 \u00een contesta\u021bie ar fi \u00een contradic\u021bie cu noua hot\u0103r\u00e2re a judec\u0103torului instan\u021bei de fond, f\u0103r\u0103 a avea aptitudinea procesual\u0103 de a o invalida.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Acelea\u0219i consecin\u021be sunt generate \u0219i de interpretarea neconstitu\u021bional\u0103 prin care se apreciaz\u0103 c\u0103 termenul de 5 zile de la \u00eenregistrarea contesta\u021biei s-ar calcula de la \u00eenregistrarea c\u0103ii de atac la instan\u021ba competent\u0103 s\u0103 solu\u021bioneze contesta\u021bia, nu de la momentul la care inculpatul \u00eenregistreaz\u0103 contesta\u021bia la instan\u021ba competent\u0103, care a pronun\u021bat \u00eencheierea contestat\u0103. \u00centr-o astfel de interpretare, termenul de 5 zile, de\u0219i este stipulat \u00een favoarea inculpatului, curge de la un moment care este l\u0103sat la aprecierea discre\u021bionar\u0103 a judec\u0103torului instan\u021bei de fond, care de cele mai multe ori transmite dosarul instan\u021bei superioare, dup\u0103 ce g\u0103se\u0219te timpul necesar redact\u0103rii \u00eencheierii. Relevant este \u00eens\u0103, c\u0103 o astfel de interpretare d\u0103 na\u0219tere solu\u021biilor \u00eent\u00e2lnite \u00een practic\u0103, precum cele de mai sus, care \u00eencalc\u0103 drepturile inculpatului prev\u0103zute de Constitu\u021bie \u0219i CEDO.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Fa\u021b\u0103 de aceste considerente, apreciem c\u0103 lipsa unei sanc\u021biuni procedurale pentru \u00eenc\u0103lcarea termenului imperativ prev\u0103zut de art. 205 alin. (4) CPP, precum \u0219i interpretarea art. 205 alin. (4) CPP \u00een sensul \u00een care termenul de solu\u021bionare a contesta\u021biei se calculeaz\u0103 de la \u00eenregistrarea contesta\u021biei la instan\u021ba competent\u0103 s\u0103 solu\u021bioneze contesta\u021bia \u0219i nu de la momentul \u00eenregistr\u0103rii contesta\u021biei de c\u0103tre inculpat, atrage \u00eenc\u0103lcarea art. 1 alin. (3) \u015fi (5), art. 21 alin. (1), (3), art. 23 alin. (2) \u0219i (7) din Constitu\u021bia Rom\u00e2niei.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Concluzii \u0219i perspective<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Admiterea sesiz\u0103rii de c\u0103tre Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti \u0219i trimiterea excep\u021biei de neconstitu\u021bionalitate c\u0103tre CCR reprezint\u0103 un pas esen\u021bial pentru clarificarea \u0219i armonizarea legisla\u021biei procesual-penale. Este imperios necesar ca textele legale care reglementeaz\u0103 m\u0103surile preventive s\u0103 fie \u00eenso\u021bite de sanc\u021biuni procesuale eficiente, pentru a asigura respectarea drepturilor fundamentale \u0219i a evita abuzurile de procedur\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Prin decizia pe care o va pronun\u021ba, CCR are oportunitatea de a consolida principiile statului de drept \u0219i de a proteja efectiv drepturile justi\u021biabililor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La data de&nbsp;11 iulie 2024, \u00een dosarul&nbsp;15962\/301\/2024\/a1.3, Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti a admis cererea de sesizare a&nbsp;Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Rom\u00e2niei (CCR)&nbsp;formulat\u0103 de mine, \u00een calitate de ap\u0103r\u0103tor, \u0219i a dispus sesizarea CCR cu privire la&nbsp;neconstitu\u021bionalitatea prevederilor art. 205 alin. (3) \u0219i (4) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 (CPP), prin raportare la prevederile&nbsp;art. 1 alin. (3) \u0219i (5), [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":287,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,1],"tags":[7],"class_list":["post-286","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-articole","category-uncategorized","tag-avocat-drept-penal","czr-hentry"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v19.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti sesizeaz\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei la cererea Cabinetului de Avocat Tecaru Viorel \u2013 problema nerespect\u0103rii termenelor procedurale imperative din materia m\u0103surilor preventive - Tecaru Viorel - Cabinet de Avocat<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"ro_RO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti sesizeaz\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei la cererea Cabinetului de Avocat Tecaru Viorel \u2013 problema nerespect\u0103rii termenelor procedurale imperative din materia m\u0103surilor preventive - Tecaru Viorel - Cabinet de Avocat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"La data de&nbsp;11 iulie 2024, \u00een dosarul&nbsp;15962\/301\/2024\/a1.3, Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti a admis cererea de sesizare a&nbsp;Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Rom\u00e2niei (CCR)&nbsp;formulat\u0103 de mine, \u00een calitate de ap\u0103r\u0103tor, \u0219i a dispus sesizarea CCR cu privire la&nbsp;neconstitu\u021bionalitatea prevederilor art. 205 alin. (3) \u0219i (4) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 (CPP), prin raportare la prevederile&nbsp;art. 1 alin. (3) \u0219i (5), [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Tecaru Viorel - Cabinet de Avocat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-11-17T15:37:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-30T08:48:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/13b25499-38c2-4c7e-a82c-7e937b6a95cd.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Scris de\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Timp estimat pentru citire\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/\",\"name\":\"Tecaru Viorel - Cabinet de Avocat\",\"description\":\"Blog de informa\u021bii juridice\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/13b25499-38c2-4c7e-a82c-7e937b6a95cd.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/13b25499-38c2-4c7e-a82c-7e937b6a95cd.webp\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":1024,\"caption\":\"Avocat drept penal Bucure\u0219ti Ilfov\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/\",\"name\":\"Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti sesizeaz\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei la cererea Cabinetului de Avocat Tecaru Viorel \u2013 problema nerespect\u0103rii termenelor procedurale imperative din materia m\u0103surilor preventive - Tecaru Viorel - Cabinet de Avocat\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-11-17T15:37:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-30T08:48:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/da166de1524076a24e1c911d9c94c856\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Prima pagin\u0103\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti sesizeaz\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei la cererea Cabinetului de Avocat Tecaru Viorel \u2013 problema nerespect\u0103rii termenelor procedurale imperative din materia m\u0103surilor preventive\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/da166de1524076a24e1c911d9c94c856\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"ro-RO\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cf10f6ad7e4649011717c8fa6e78b601fc6318f71790dd090c3593fcacc0eb2d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cf10f6ad7e4649011717c8fa6e78b601fc6318f71790dd090c3593fcacc0eb2d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/author\/viorel\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti sesizeaz\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei la cererea Cabinetului de Avocat Tecaru Viorel \u2013 problema nerespect\u0103rii termenelor procedurale imperative din materia m\u0103surilor preventive - Tecaru Viorel - Cabinet de Avocat","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/","og_locale":"ro_RO","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti sesizeaz\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei la cererea Cabinetului de Avocat Tecaru Viorel \u2013 problema nerespect\u0103rii termenelor procedurale imperative din materia m\u0103surilor preventive - Tecaru Viorel - Cabinet de Avocat","og_description":"La data de&nbsp;11 iulie 2024, \u00een dosarul&nbsp;15962\/301\/2024\/a1.3, Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti a admis cererea de sesizare a&nbsp;Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale a Rom\u00e2niei (CCR)&nbsp;formulat\u0103 de mine, \u00een calitate de ap\u0103r\u0103tor, \u0219i a dispus sesizarea CCR cu privire la&nbsp;neconstitu\u021bionalitatea prevederilor art. 205 alin. (3) \u0219i (4) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 (CPP), prin raportare la prevederile&nbsp;art. 1 alin. (3) \u0219i (5), [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/","og_site_name":"Tecaru Viorel - Cabinet de Avocat","article_published_time":"2024-11-17T15:37:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-30T08:48:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/13b25499-38c2-4c7e-a82c-7e937b6a95cd.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Scris de":"admin","Timp estimat pentru citire":"11 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/#website","url":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/","name":"Tecaru Viorel - Cabinet de Avocat","description":"Blog de informa\u021bii juridice","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"ro-RO"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/13b25499-38c2-4c7e-a82c-7e937b6a95cd.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/13b25499-38c2-4c7e-a82c-7e937b6a95cd.webp","width":1024,"height":1024,"caption":"Avocat drept penal Bucure\u0219ti Ilfov"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/","url":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/","name":"Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti sesizeaz\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei la cererea Cabinetului de Avocat Tecaru Viorel \u2013 problema nerespect\u0103rii termenelor procedurale imperative din materia m\u0103surilor preventive - Tecaru Viorel - Cabinet de Avocat","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2024-11-17T15:37:28+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-30T08:48:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/da166de1524076a24e1c911d9c94c856"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"ro-RO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/2024\/11\/17\/tribunalul-bucuresti-sesizeaza-curtea-constitutionala-a-romaniei-la-cererea-cabinetului-de-avocat-tecaru-viorel-problema-respectarii-termenelor-procedurale-din-materia-masurilor-preventive\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Prima pagin\u0103","item":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tribunalul Bucure\u0219ti sesizeaz\u0103 Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei la cererea Cabinetului de Avocat Tecaru Viorel \u2013 problema nerespect\u0103rii termenelor procedurale imperative din materia m\u0103surilor preventive"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/da166de1524076a24e1c911d9c94c856","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"ro-RO","@id":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cf10f6ad7e4649011717c8fa6e78b601fc6318f71790dd090c3593fcacc0eb2d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cf10f6ad7e4649011717c8fa6e78b601fc6318f71790dd090c3593fcacc0eb2d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/tecaru.ro"],"url":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/author\/viorel\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=286"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":314,"href":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/286\/revisions\/314"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/287"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=286"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tecaru.ro\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}